Copyright © 2014 by Ralph Couey
Written content only.
In 1988, the National Football League franchise located in Washington DC won Super Bowl XXII, thumping the Denver Broncos 42-10. Washington was quarterbacked by Doug Williams, the first African-American QB to not only play in, but win the Big Game. It was also the first of what would be countless public demonstrations and protests concerning the team's nickname, "Redskins."
The nickname, many believe, is a word born out of racism dating back to the first time white Europeans pushed into the tribal frontier. The issue is rapidly coming to a head, with the National Patent Office stripping the team of their copyright on the name. Across the country, two sets of voices are being raised, one which demands that this term be banned from not only the NFL, but all teams in all sports. The other set of voices contends that in the modern context, the term is much more closely related to the team and not to that group of people who have come to be called "Native Americans."
Football aside, I have a bit of a problem with that term. Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as a native American because human life did not arise here spontaneously as it did in Africa some 200,000 years ago. Over the millennia continents have drifted, and sea levels have fallen and risen. This created pathways of migration. Everyone here on these three continents (North, Central, and South America, respectively) came here from someplace else, mainly across the Bering land bridge beginning about 16,000 years ago, by the latest estimate. I prefer the term "First Americans." It is more accurate, plus it retains the honorific of them being the first to take possession of these lands.
Team owner Dan Snyder has planted his foot firmly in the rich soil of tradition, vowing to never change the team's name. But protests are gathering momentum and there seems little doubt that at some point in the near future a Waterloo -- or Little Big Horn -- will be reached when irrevocable action will be taken.
This is not the first time that politics has impacted a team name. In the 1950's during the virulent anti-communist Joe McCarthy era, the Cincinnati Major League Baseball team, in trying to steer clear of any ideological taint changed their name from the "Reds" to the "Redlegs." Apparently nobody knew that the original Redlegs referred to the roving bands of anti-slavery terrorists who roamed the border states before, during, and after the Civil War.
There are a lot of other teams closely monitoring this controversy, namely every team that carries a name even remotely associated with First Americans. The likely next target will be the Kansas City Chiefs.
While the team and it's passionate fanbase have used the name in its First American context, the name actually refers to Kansas City Mayor H. Roe Bartle, whose nickname was "Chief", and the one primarily responsible for bringing the team from Dallas to KC. The original team logo...
...portrayed a First American in ceremonial headdress racing across six midwestern states with a football in one hand and a tomahawk in the other. This was a quick and dirty adaptation of the original Dallas Texans logo which showed a cowboy, complete with 6-guns, racing across the state of Texas.
After 1963, however, the First American logo disappeared from official team use and was replaced by the simple arrowhead...
...familiar to all football fans now. The logo, interestingly enough, was an adaptation by Chief's owner Lamar Hunt of the San Francisco 49'er logo, with the interlocking letters inside an arrowhead instead of an oval. The arrowhead itself, by the way, has been dated back to Europe, Africa, and Asia as much as 60,000 years ago, a part of the armory which included bone knives and stone axes. So the current logo is more reflective of the legacy of homo sapiens in general and not a single iteration of it.